Issue 2213 - landing page for mobile beta launch (CMS)

Anwiki review:
http://codereview.adblockplus.org/4814987935612928/

Related ticket:
https://issues.adblockplus.org/ticket/2213

[saroyanm, 2015-05-18 15:58:39]

Sebastian can you please have a look, actually initially I was thinking we are
going to skip the review, because of the short time before the announcement. 
Will create separate review for other changes soon.

[Sebastian Noack, 2015-05-18 16:08:15]

Please process the image with pngout.

http://codereview.adblockplus.org/4528719876063232/diff/5629499534213120/page...
File pages/adblock-browser.html (right):

http://codereview.adblockplus.org/4528719876063232/diff/5629499534213120/page...
pages/adblock-browser.html:270: <input id="subscribe-textbox" type="email"
name="email" placeholder="{{s10 Your email address}}" />
Where did the "required" attribute go? :(

[saroyanm, 2015-05-18 16:51:10]

http://codereview.adblockplus.org/4528719876063232/diff/5629499534213120/page...
File pages/adblock-browser.html (right):

http://codereview.adblockplus.org/4528719876063232/diff/5629499534213120/page...
pages/adblock-browser.html:270: <input id="subscribe-textbox" type="email"
name="email" placeholder="{{s10 Your email address}}" />
On 2015/05/18 16:08:16, Sebastian Noack wrote:
> Where did the "required" attribute go? :(

Oops, Done.

[saroyanm, 2015-05-18 16:51:24]

On 2015/05/18 16:08:15, Sebastian Noack wrote:
> Please process the image with pngout.
Done.

[Sebastian Noack, 2015-05-18 16:53:58]

LGTM

[Wladimir Palant, 2015-05-18 18:01:52]

Looks ok but we should really use more meaningful string identifiers than s8.

[saroyanm, 2015-05-18 18:22:39]

On 2015/05/18 18:01:52, Wladimir Palant wrote:
> Looks ok but we should really use more meaningful string identifiers than s8.
Done.

[Wladimir Palant, 2015-05-18 18:30:13]

LGTM

[Sebastian Noack, 2015-05-18 18:35:23]

LGTM

[saroyanm, 2015-05-18 19:35:16]

@Ross actually we had a review for the Adblock  Browser Landing Page, can you
please test the changes. 
Applying the delta diff with the patchset of number 1 should be enough.
The changes as you can see are small so nothing big is expected I have a quick
test with Chrome and IE 8 and it works okey.