Rietveld Code Review Tool
Help | Bug tracker | Discussion group | Source code

Issue 5755650030174208: Issue 2602 - Extend Shadow DOM workaround to all Google subdomains (Closed)

Created:
June 12, 2015, 11:48 a.m. by Sebastian Noack
Modified:
June 15, 2015, 7:13 a.m.
Reviewers:
kzar
CC:
Wladimir Palant, Thomas Greiner
Visibility:
Public.

Description

Issue 2602 - Extend Shadow DOM workaround to all Google subdomains

Patch Set 1 : #

Unified diffs Side-by-side diffs Delta from patch set Stats (+3 lines, -6 lines) Patch
M include.preload.js View 1 chunk +3 lines, -6 lines 0 comments Download

Messages

Total messages: 4
Sebastian Noack
June 12, 2015, 11:49 a.m. (2015-06-12 11:49:47 UTC) #1
kzar
I don't know the specifics about this problem to know if the regexp is suitable, ...
June 12, 2015, 12:13 p.m. (2015-06-12 12:13:32 UTC) #2
Sebastian Noack
On 2015/06/12 12:13:32, kzar wrote: > I don't know the specifics about this problem to ...
June 12, 2015, 12:23 p.m. (2015-06-12 12:23:03 UTC) #3
kzar
June 12, 2015, 12:27 p.m. (2015-06-12 12:27:46 UTC) #4
On 2015/06/12 12:23:03, Sebastian Noack wrote:
> On 2015/06/12 12:13:32, kzar wrote:
> > I don't know the specifics about this problem to know if the regexp is
> suitable,
> > for example are any google.co.uk subdomains broken by this problem? But the
> > regexp seems to work as expected and I can't see any problems so LGTM
> 
> The details are in the comments of the issue. Apparently at least
> http://inbox.google.com and http://productforums.google.com are affected as
well. So to keep
> the logic simple here, and in case more subdomains are effected, I went with
> simply checking for *.google.com.
> 
> If you are aware of any Google service that uses their feedback functionality
-
> which causes the issue we are working around here - that isn't covered by that
> regular expression let me know. But at least Gmail and product forums are only
> available under the http://google.com domain.

I have read the issue. I can't think of any non google.com examples either, just
thought it was possible and therefore worth mentioning. Yea, it still LGTM.

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld