Issue 4988 - [emscripten] Adjust API for Element Hiding Emulation filters

compiled/ElemHideBase.cpp

Index: compiled/ElemHideBase.cpp
===================================================================
--- a/compiled/ElemHideBase.cpp
+++ b/compiled/ElemHideBase.cpp
@@ -1,10 +1,9 @@
 #include "ElemHideBase.h"
-#include "CSSPropertyFilter.h"
 #include "StringScanner.h"
 
 namespace
 {
   void NormalizeWhitespace(DependentString& text, String::size_type& domainsEnd,
       String::size_type& selectorStart)
   {
     // For element hiding filters we only want to remove spaces preceding the
@@ -28,17 +27,17 @@ namespace
         text[pos - delta] = text[pos];
     }
     selectorStart -= delta;
 
     text.reset(text, 0, len - delta);
   }
 }
 
-ElemHideBase::ElemHideBase(Type type, const String& text, const ElemHideBaseData& data)
+ElemHideBase::ElemHideBase(Type type, const String& text, const ElemHideData& data)
     : ActiveFilter(type, text, false), mData(data)
 {
   if (mData.HasDomains())
     ParseDomains(mData.GetDomainsSource(mText), u',');
 }
 
 Filter::Type ElemHideBase::Parse(DependentString& text, ElemHideData& data)
 {
@@ -100,42 +99,18 @@ Filter::Type ElemHideBase::Parse(Depende
   // We are done validating, now we can normalize whitespace and the domain part
   if (seenSpaces)
     NormalizeWhitespace(text, data.mDomainsEnd, data.mSelectorStart);
   DependentString(text, 0, data.mDomainsEnd).toLower();
 
   if (exception)
     return Type::ELEMHIDEEXCEPTION;
 
-  do
-  {
-    // Is this a CSS property rule maybe?
-    DependentString searchString(u"[-abp-properties="_str);
-    data.mPrefixEnd = text.find(searchString, data.mSelectorStart);
-    if (data.mPrefixEnd == text.npos ||
-        data.mPrefixEnd + searchString.length() + 1 >= text.length())
-    {
-      break;
-    }
-
-    data.mRegexpStart = data.mPrefixEnd + searchString.length() + 1;
-    char16_t quotation = text[data.mRegexpStart - 1];
-    if (quotation != u'\'' && quotation != u'"')
-      break;
-
-    data.mRegexpEnd = text.find(quotation, data.mRegexpStart);
-    if (data.mRegexpEnd == text.npos || data.mRegexpEnd + 1 >= text.length() ||
-      text[data.mRegexpEnd + 1] != u']')
-    {
-      break;
-    }
-
-    data.mSuffixStart = data.mRegexpEnd + 2;
-    return Type::CSSPROPERTY;
-  } while (false);
+  if (text.find(u"[-abp-properties="_str, data.mSelectorStart) != text.npos)

[sergei, 2017/03/24 11:59:26]

Nit: issue says "[-abp-properties" but here we use "[-abp-properties=" (equal
sign).

[Wladimir Palant, 2017/03/25 18:48:19]

Nice catch. Actually, what I wrote in the issue matches the current
implementation, yet what I ended up implemented makes more sense. I've asked
Felix who wrote the current implementation, IMHO it makes sense to search for
"[-abp-properties=" there as well.

[Wladimir Palant, 2017/03/27 07:58:00]

The conclusion is: I've modified the issue, and we filed
https://issues.adblockplus.org/ticket/5037 on adjusting the current JS-based
code as well.

+    return Type::ELEMHIDEEMULATION;
 
   return Type::ELEMHIDE;
 }
 
 OwnedString ElemHideBase::GetSelectorDomain() const
 {
   /* TODO this is inefficient */
   OwnedString result;