Rietveld Code Review Tool
Help | Bug tracker | Discussion group | Source code

Unified Diff: lib/csp.js

Issue 29394585: Issue 5027 - Use updated webRequest API for WebSocket blocking (Closed)
Patch Set: addresses bad comments, and actually fixes requestBlocker logic Created March 28, 2017, 7:18 p.m.
Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments.
Jump to:
View side-by-side diff with in-line comments
Download patch
« no previous file with comments | « chrome/ext/background.js ('k') | lib/requestBlocker.js » ('j') | no next file with comments »
Expand Comments ('e') | Collapse Comments ('c') | Show Comments Hide Comments ('s')
Index: lib/csp.js
===================================================================
--- a/lib/csp.js
+++ b/lib/csp.js
@@ -12,49 +12,56 @@
* GNU General Public License for more details.
*
* You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
* along with Adblock Plus. If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
*/
"use strict";
-const {defaultMatcher} = require("matcher");
-const {BlockingFilter, RegExpFilter} = require("filterClasses");
-const {getDecodedHostname} = require("url");
-const {checkWhitelisted} = require("whitelisting");
+// Versions of Chrome < 58 the webRequest API does not intercept WebSocket
Sebastian Noack 2017/03/28 19:32:29 This seems grammatically wrong. This should rather
Jon Sonesen 2017/03/28 20:10:29 Done.
+// connections see: https://crbug.com/129353
+//
+// Hence we inject CSP headers, below, as a workaround.
Sebastian Noack 2017/03/28 19:32:29 IMHO, this shouldn't be a new paragraph, as we eve
Jon Sonesen 2017/03/28 20:10:29 Done.
+if (!("WEBSOCKET" in chrome.webRequest.ResourceType))
+{
+ const {defaultMatcher} = require("matcher");
+ const {BlockingFilter, RegExpFilter} = require("filterClasses");
+ const {getDecodedHostname} = require("url");
+ const {checkWhitelisted} = require("whitelisting");
-chrome.webRequest.onHeadersReceived.addListener(details =>
-{
- let hostname = getDecodedHostname(new URL(details.url));
- let match = defaultMatcher.matchesAny("", RegExpFilter.typeMap.WEBSOCKET,
- hostname, false, null, true);
- if (match instanceof BlockingFilter &&
- !checkWhitelisted(new ext.Page({id: details.tabId}),
- ext.getFrame(details.tabId, details.frameId)))
+ chrome.webRequest.onHeadersReceived.addListener(details =>
{
- details.responseHeaders.push({
- name: "Content-Security-Policy",
- // We're blocking WebSockets here by adding a connect-src restriction
- // since the Chrome extension API does not allow us to intercept them.
- // https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=129353
- //
- // We also need the frame-src and object-src restrictions since CSPs are
- // not inherited from the parent for documents with data: and blob: URLs.
- // https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=513860
- //
- // We must use the deprecated child-src directive instead of worker-src
- // since that's not supported yet (as of Chrome 56.)
- //
- // "http:" also includes "https:" implictly.
- // https://www.chromestatus.com/feature/6653486812889088
- value: "connect-src http:; child-src http:; frame-src http:; object-src http:"
- });
- return {responseHeaders: details.responseHeaders};
- }
-}, {
- urls: ["http://*/*", "https://*/*"],
- // We must also intercept script requests since otherwise Web Workers can
- // be abused to execute scripts for which our Content Security Policy
- // won't be injected.
- // https://github.com/gorhill/uBO-Extra/issues/19
- types: ["main_frame", "sub_frame", "script"]
-}, ["blocking", "responseHeaders"]);
+ let hostname = getDecodedHostname(new URL(details.url));
+ let match = defaultMatcher.matchesAny("", RegExpFilter.typeMap.WEBSOCKET,
+ hostname, false, null, true);
+ if (match instanceof BlockingFilter &&
+ !checkWhitelisted(new ext.Page({id: details.tabId}),
+ ext.getFrame(details.tabId, details.frameId)))
+ {
+ details.responseHeaders.push({
+ name: "Content-Security-Policy",
+ // We're blocking WebSockets here by adding a connect-src restriction
+ // since the Chrome extension API does not allow us to intercept them.
+ // https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=129353
+ //
+ // We also need the frame-src and object-src restrictions since CSPs are
Sebastian Noack 2017/03/28 19:32:29 This line still seems too long.
Jon Sonesen 2017/03/28 20:10:29 Done.
+ // not inherited from the parent for documents with data and blob URLs.
Sebastian Noack 2017/03/28 19:32:29 As I explained before, please don't remove the col
Jon Sonesen 2017/03/28 20:10:29 Done.
+ // https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=513860
+ //
+ // We must use the deprecated child-src directive instead of worker-src
+ // since that's not supported yet (as of Chrome 56.)
+ //
+ // "http:" also includes "https:" implictly.
+ // https://www.chromestatus.com/feature/6653486812889088
+ value: "connect-src http:; child-src http:; frame-src http:; object-src http:"
+ });
+ return {responseHeaders: details.responseHeaders};
+ }
+ }, {
+ urls: ["http://*/*", "https://*/*"],
+ // We must also intercept script requests since otherwise Web Workers can
+ // be abused to execute scripts for which our Content Security Policy
+ // won't be injected.
+ // https://github.com/gorhill/uBO-Extra/issues/19
+ types: ["main_frame", "sub_frame", "script"]
+ }, ["blocking", "responseHeaders"]);
+}
« no previous file with comments | « chrome/ext/background.js ('k') | lib/requestBlocker.js » ('j') | no next file with comments »

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld