Index: lib/csp.js |
=================================================================== |
--- a/lib/csp.js |
+++ b/lib/csp.js |
@@ -12,49 +12,55 @@ |
* GNU General Public License for more details. |
* |
* You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License |
* along with Adblock Plus. If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>. |
*/ |
"use strict"; |
-const {defaultMatcher} = require("matcher"); |
-const {BlockingFilter, RegExpFilter} = require("filterClasses"); |
-const {getDecodedHostname} = require("url"); |
-const {checkWhitelisted} = require("whitelisting"); |
+// Before Chrome 58, the webRequest API did not intercept WebSocket |
+// connections (see https://crbug.com/129353). Hence we inject CSP headers, |
+// below, as a workaround. |
+if (!("WEBSOCKET" in chrome.webRequest.ResourceType)) |
+{ |
+ const {defaultMatcher} = require("matcher"); |
+ const {BlockingFilter, RegExpFilter} = require("filterClasses"); |
+ const {getDecodedHostname} = require("url"); |
+ const {checkWhitelisted} = require("whitelisting"); |
-chrome.webRequest.onHeadersReceived.addListener(details => |
-{ |
- let hostname = getDecodedHostname(new URL(details.url)); |
- let match = defaultMatcher.matchesAny("", RegExpFilter.typeMap.WEBSOCKET, |
- hostname, false, null, true); |
- if (match instanceof BlockingFilter && |
- !checkWhitelisted(new ext.Page({id: details.tabId}), |
- ext.getFrame(details.tabId, details.frameId))) |
+ chrome.webRequest.onHeadersReceived.addListener(details => |
{ |
- details.responseHeaders.push({ |
- name: "Content-Security-Policy", |
- // We're blocking WebSockets here by adding a connect-src restriction |
- // since the Chrome extension API does not allow us to intercept them. |
- // https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=129353 |
- // |
- // We also need the frame-src and object-src restrictions since CSPs are |
- // not inherited from the parent for documents with data: and blob: URLs. |
- // https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=513860 |
- // |
- // We must use the deprecated child-src directive instead of worker-src |
- // since that's not supported yet (as of Chrome 56.) |
- // |
- // "http:" also includes "https:" implictly. |
- // https://www.chromestatus.com/feature/6653486812889088 |
- value: "connect-src http:; child-src http:; frame-src http:; object-src http:" |
- }); |
- return {responseHeaders: details.responseHeaders}; |
- } |
-}, { |
- urls: ["http://*/*", "https://*/*"], |
- // We must also intercept script requests since otherwise Web Workers can |
- // be abused to execute scripts for which our Content Security Policy |
- // won't be injected. |
- // https://github.com/gorhill/uBO-Extra/issues/19 |
- types: ["main_frame", "sub_frame", "script"] |
-}, ["blocking", "responseHeaders"]); |
+ let hostname = getDecodedHostname(new URL(details.url)); |
+ let match = defaultMatcher.matchesAny("", RegExpFilter.typeMap.WEBSOCKET, |
+ hostname, false, null, true); |
+ if (match instanceof BlockingFilter && |
+ !checkWhitelisted(new ext.Page({id: details.tabId}), |
+ ext.getFrame(details.tabId, details.frameId))) |
+ { |
+ details.responseHeaders.push({ |
+ name: "Content-Security-Policy", |
+ // We're blocking WebSockets here by adding a connect-src restriction |
+ // since the Chrome extension API does not allow us to intercept them. |
+ // https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=129353 |
+ // |
+ // We also need the frame-src and object-src restrictions since CSPs |
+ // are not inherited from the parent for documents with data: and blob: |
+ // URLs, see https://crbug.com/513860. |
+ // |
+ // We must use the deprecated child-src directive instead of worker-src |
+ // since that's not supported yet (as of Chrome 56.) |
+ // |
+ // "http:" also includes "https:" implictly. |
+ // https://www.chromestatus.com/feature/6653486812889088 |
+ value: "connect-src http:; child-src http:; frame-src http:; object-src http:" |
+ }); |
+ return {responseHeaders: details.responseHeaders}; |
+ } |
+ }, { |
+ urls: ["http://*/*", "https://*/*"], |
+ // We must also intercept script requests since otherwise Web Workers can |
+ // be abused to execute scripts for which our Content Security Policy |
+ // won't be injected. |
+ // https://github.com/gorhill/uBO-Extra/issues/19 |
+ types: ["main_frame", "sub_frame", "script"] |
+ }, ["blocking", "responseHeaders"]); |
+} |