Rietveld Code Review Tool
Help | Bug tracker | Discussion group | Source code

Unified Diff: compile

Issue 29431555: Issue 5216 - [emscripten] Use a more reliable way of retrieving mangled function name (Closed) Base URL: https://hg.adblockplus.org/adblockpluscore
Patch Set: Use std::string for function name rather than std::vector Created May 8, 2017, 10:12 a.m.
Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments.
Jump to:
View side-by-side diff with in-line comments
Download patch
« no previous file with comments | « no previous file | compiled/bindings/generator.h » ('j') | compiled/bindings/generator.cpp » ('J')
Expand Comments ('e') | Collapse Comments ('c') | Show Comments Hide Comments ('s')
Index: compile
===================================================================
--- a/compile
+++ b/compile
@@ -70,17 +70,18 @@ def getenv(emscripten_config):
'NODE_JS': scope.get('NODE_JS', 'node'),
})
return env
def generate_bindings(env):
params = [
env['PYTHON'], os.path.join(env['EMSCRIPTEN'], 'emcc'),
- '-o', BINDINGS_GENERATOR, '-std=gnu++14', '--js-library', JS_LIBRARY,
+ '-o', BINDINGS_GENERATOR, '-std=c++1z', '--js-library', JS_LIBRARY,
sergei 2017/05/08 10:58:19 does c++1z influence somehow on the generated code
Wladimir Palant 2017/05/08 11:41:34 No, the build is identical. The only thing changin
+ '--js-library', os.path.join(SOURCE_DIR, 'bindings', 'library.js'),
] + list(get_source_files('bindings'))
subprocess.check_call(params, env=env)
with open(BINDINGS_OUTPUT, 'w') as file:
subprocess.check_call([env['NODE_JS'], BINDINGS_GENERATOR],
stdout=file)
« no previous file with comments | « no previous file | compiled/bindings/generator.h » ('j') | compiled/bindings/generator.cpp » ('J')

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld