Rietveld Code Review Tool
Help | Bug tracker | Discussion group | Source code

Side by Side Diff: pages/acceptable-ads.md

Issue 29511696: Issue 5447 - Add missing essential meta data to adblockplus.org (Closed) Base URL: https://hg.adblockplus.org/web.adblockplus.org
Patch Set: Updated locales before re-landing after blog fix Created Sept. 13, 2017, 12:25 p.m.
Left:
Right:
Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments.
Jump to:
View unified diff | Download patch
« no previous file with comments | « includes/index.tmpl ('k') | pages/bugs.html » ('j') | no next file with comments »
Toggle Intra-line Diffs ('i') | Expand Comments ('e') | Collapse Comments ('c') | Show Comments Hide Comments ('s')
OLDNEW
1 title=Allowing acceptable ads in Adblock Plus 1 title=Allowing acceptable ads in Adblock Plus
2 2
3 <head> 3 <head>
4 <meta content="{{meta-title[Title meta tag content inside head tag] Acceptable Ads - Adblock Plus}}" name="title" />
5 <meta content="{{meta-description[Description meta tag content inside head tag ] Adblock Plus introduces the Acceptable Ads initiative: Support websites that r ely on advertising but choose to do it in a non-intrusive way.}}" name="descript ion" /> 4 <meta content="{{meta-description[Description meta tag content inside head tag ] Adblock Plus introduces the Acceptable Ads initiative: Support websites that r ely on advertising but choose to do it in a non-intrusive way.}}" name="descript ion" />
6 <meta content="{{meta-title}}" property="og:title" />
7 <meta content="{{meta-description}}" property="og:description" /> 5 <meta content="{{meta-description}}" property="og:description" />
8 <style type="text/css"> 6 <style type="text/css">
9 .footnote-reference 7 .footnote-reference
10 { 8 {
11 vertical-align: super; 9 vertical-align: super;
12 font-size: 0.7em; 10 font-size: 0.7em;
13 } 11 }
14 12
15 h3, 13 h3,
16 h4 14 h4
(...skipping 175 matching lines...) Expand 10 before | Expand all | Expand 10 after
192 190
193 ## {{does-users-need[Section header] Do Adblock Plus users really want this feat ure?}} {: #who } 191 ## {{does-users-need[Section header] Do Adblock Plus users really want this feat ure?}} {: #who }
194 {{survey[Text in "who want acceptable ads" section] The <a href="/blog/adblock-p lus-user-survey-results-part-3">results of our user survey</a> say yes. Accordin g to the survey, only 25 percent of Adblock Plus users are strictly against all advertising. They can disable the feature and browse completely ad-free. The oth er 75 percent replied that they would accept some advertising to help support we bsites.}} 192 {{survey[Text in "who want acceptable ads" section] The <a href="/blog/adblock-p lus-user-survey-results-part-3">results of our user survey</a> say yes. Accordin g to the survey, only 25 percent of Adblock Plus users are strictly against all advertising. They can disable the feature and browse completely ad-free. The oth er 75 percent replied that they would accept some advertising to help support we bsites.}}
195 193
196 ## {{revenue[Section header] Is there payment involved?}} {: #revenue } 194 ## {{revenue[Section header] Is there payment involved?}} {: #revenue }
197 {{main-revenue[Text in "Is there payment involved?" section] We receive some don ations from our users, but our main source of revenue comes as part of the Accep table Ads initiative. Larger entities (as defined below) pay a licensing fee for the whitelisting services requested and provided to them (around 90 percent of the licences are granted for free). It should be noted that the Acceptable Ads c riteria must be met independent of the consideration for payments. If the criter ia are not met, whitelisting is impossible.}} 195 {{main-revenue[Text in "Is there payment involved?" section] We receive some don ations from our users, but our main source of revenue comes as part of the Accep table Ads initiative. Larger entities (as defined below) pay a licensing fee for the whitelisting services requested and provided to them (around 90 percent of the licences are granted for free). It should be noted that the Acceptable Ads c riteria must be met independent of the consideration for payments. If the criter ia are not met, whitelisting is impossible.}}
198 196
199 {{who-pays[Text in "Is there payment involved?" section] Regarding fees, only la rge entities (those with more than 10 million additional ad impressions per mont h due to participation in the Acceptable Ads initiative) have to pay. For these entities, our licensing fee normally represents 30 percent of the additional rev enue created by whitelisting its acceptable ads.}} 197 {{who-pays[Text in "Is there payment involved?" section] Regarding fees, only la rge entities (those with more than 10 million additional ad impressions per mont h due to participation in the Acceptable Ads initiative) have to pay. For these entities, our licensing fee normally represents 30 percent of the additional rev enue created by whitelisting its acceptable ads.}}
200 198
201 {{more-details[Text in "Is there payment involved?" section] For more details se e <a href="/about#monetization">here</a>.}} 199 {{more-details[Text in "Is there payment involved?" section] For more details se e <a href="/about#monetization">here</a>.}}
OLDNEW
« no previous file with comments | « includes/index.tmpl ('k') | pages/bugs.html » ('j') | no next file with comments »

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld