Index: lib/cssInjection.js |
=================================================================== |
--- a/lib/cssInjection.js |
+++ b/lib/cssInjection.js |
@@ -21,21 +21,29 @@ |
const {RegExpFilter} = require("filterClasses"); |
const {ElemHide} = require("elemHide"); |
const {ElemHideEmulation} = require("elemHideEmulation"); |
const {checkWhitelisted} = require("whitelisting"); |
const {extractHostFromFrame} = require("url"); |
const {port} = require("messaging"); |
const devtools = require("devtools"); |
+const info = require("info"); |
-const userStyleSheetsSupported = "extensionTypes" in browser && |
- "CSSOrigin" in browser.extensionTypes; |
+// Chromium's support for tabs.removeCSS is still a work in progress and the |
+// API is likely to be different from Firefox's; for now we just don't use it |
+// at all, even if it's available. |
+// See https://crbug.com/608854 |
+const styleSheetRemovalSupported = "removeCSS" in browser.tabs && |
+ info.platform == "gecko"; |
Sebastian Noack
2018/01/31 14:30:05
tabs.removeCSS() was added in Firefox 49. The olde
Manish Jethani
2018/02/01 08:05:07
Done.
|
+ |
const selectorGroupSize = 1024; |
+let userStyleSheetsSupported = true; |
+ |
function* splitSelectors(selectors) |
{ |
// Chromium's Blink engine supports only up to 8,192 simple selectors, and |
// even fewer compound selectors, in a rule. The exact number of selectors |
// that would work depends on their sizes (e.g. "#foo .bar" has a size of 2). |
// Since we don't know the sizes of the selectors here, we simply split them |
// into groups of 1,024, based on the reasonable assumption that the average |
// selector won't have a size greater than 8. The alternative would be to |
@@ -56,27 +64,42 @@ |
function createStyleSheet(selectors) |
{ |
return Array.from(createRules(selectors)).join("\n"); |
} |
function addStyleSheet(tabId, frameId, styleSheet) |
{ |
- browser.tabs.insertCSS(tabId, { |
- code: styleSheet, |
- cssOrigin: "user", |
- frameId, |
- matchAboutBlank: true, |
- runAt: "document_start" |
- }); |
+ try |
+ { |
+ browser.tabs.insertCSS(tabId, { |
+ code: styleSheet, |
+ cssOrigin: "user", |
+ frameId, |
+ matchAboutBlank: true, |
+ runAt: "document_start" |
+ }); |
+ } |
+ catch (error) |
+ { |
+ if (/\bError processing cssOrigin\b/.test(error.message) == -1) |
Sebastian Noack
2018/01/31 14:30:05
I wonder how safe the assumption is that this will
Manish Jethani
2018/02/01 08:05:07
OK, I think we should just look for /\bcssOrigin\b
Sebastian Noack
2018/02/01 10:32:50
I still think, we should just remove that check al
Manish Jethani
2018/02/01 10:40:38
Yeah I'm cool with just removing the check too. If
|
+ throw error; |
+ |
+ userStyleSheetsSupported = false; |
+ } |
+ |
+ return userStyleSheetsSupported; |
} |
function removeStyleSheet(tabId, frameId, styleSheet) |
{ |
+ if (!styleSheetRemovalSupported) |
+ return; |
+ |
browser.tabs.removeCSS(tabId, { |
code: styleSheet, |
cssOrigin: "user", |
frameId, |
matchAboutBlank: true |
}); |
} |
@@ -94,26 +117,27 @@ |
// Ideally we would compare the old and new style sheets and skip this code |
// if they're the same, but the old style sheet can be a leftover from a |
// previous instance of the frame. We must add the new style sheet |
// regardless. |
// Add the new style sheet first to keep previously hidden elements from |
// reappearing momentarily. |
- if (styleSheet) |
- addStyleSheet(tabId, frameId, styleSheet); |
+ if (styleSheet && !addStyleSheet(tabId, frameId, styleSheet)) |
+ return false; |
// Sometimes the old and new style sheets can be exactly the same. In such a |
// case, do not remove the "old" style sheet, because it is in fact the new |
// style sheet now. |
if (oldStyleSheet && oldStyleSheet != styleSheet) |
removeStyleSheet(tabId, frameId, oldStyleSheet); |
frame.injectedStyleSheets.set(groupName, styleSheet); |
+ return true; |
} |
port.on("elemhide.getSelectors", (message, sender) => |
{ |
let selectors = []; |
let emulatedPatterns = []; |
let trace = devtools && devtools.hasPanel(sender.page); |
let inline = !userStyleSheetsSupported; |
@@ -130,23 +154,33 @@ |
hostname, |
specificOnly ? ElemHide.SPECIFIC_ONLY : ElemHide.ALL_MATCHING |
); |
for (let filter of ElemHideEmulation.getRulesForDomain(hostname)) |
emulatedPatterns.push({selector: filter.selector, text: filter.text}); |
} |
- if (!inline) |
- updateFrameStyles(sender.page.id, sender.frame.id, selectors, "standard"); |
+ if (!inline && !updateFrameStyles(sender.page.id, sender.frame.id, |
+ selectors, "standard")) |
+ { |
+ inline = true; |
+ } |
let response = {trace, inline, emulatedPatterns}; |
if (trace || inline) |
response.selectors = selectors; |
+ // If we can't remove user style sheets using tabs.removeCSS, we'll only keep |
+ // adding them, which could cause problems with emulation filters as |
+ // described in issue #5864. Instead, we can just ask the content script to |
+ // add styles for emulation filters inline. |
+ if (!styleSheetRemovalSupported) |
+ response.inlineEmulated = true; |
+ |
return response; |
}); |
port.on("elemhide.injectSelectors", (message, sender) => |
{ |
updateFrameStyles(sender.page.id, sender.frame.id, message.selectors, |
message.groupName); |
}); |