Rietveld Code Review Tool
Help | Bug tracker | Discussion group | Source code

Side by Side Diff: lib/csp.js

Issue 29680696: [$csp4 adblockpluschrome] Issue 5241 - Add support for Content Security Policy filters (Closed)
Patch Set: Get devtools logging working Created March 7, 2018, 3 p.m.
Left:
Right:
Use n/p to move between diff chunks; N/P to move between comments.
Jump to:
View unified diff | Download patch
« no previous file with comments | « dependencies ('k') | lib/devtools.js » ('j') | metadata.chrome » ('J')
Toggle Intra-line Diffs ('i') | Expand Comments ('e') | Collapse Comments ('c') | Show Comments Hide Comments ('s')
OLDNEW
1 /* 1 /*
2 * This file is part of Adblock Plus <https://adblockplus.org/>, 2 * This file is part of Adblock Plus <https://adblockplus.org/>,
3 * Copyright (C) 2006-present eyeo GmbH 3 * Copyright (C) 2006-present eyeo GmbH
4 * 4 *
5 * Adblock Plus is free software: you can redistribute it and/or modify 5 * Adblock Plus is free software: you can redistribute it and/or modify
6 * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 3 as 6 * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 3 as
7 * published by the Free Software Foundation. 7 * published by the Free Software Foundation.
8 * 8 *
9 * Adblock Plus is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, 9 * Adblock Plus is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
10 * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of 10 * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
11 * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the 11 * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
12 * GNU General Public License for more details. 12 * GNU General Public License for more details.
13 * 13 *
14 * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License 14 * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
15 * along with Adblock Plus. If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>. 15 * along with Adblock Plus. If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
16 */ 16 */
17 17
18 "use strict"; 18 "use strict";
19 19
20 // The webRequest API doesn't support WebSocket connection blocking in Microsoft 20 const {defaultMatcher} = require("matcher");
21 // Edge and versions of Chrome before 58. Therefore for those we inject CSP 21 const {BlockingFilter,
22 // headers below as a workaround. See https://crbug.com/129353 and 22 RegExpFilter,
23 // https://developer.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-edge/platform/issues/10297376 / 23 WhitelistFilter} = require("filterClasses");
24 if (!browser.webRequest.ResourceType || 24 const {getDecodedHostname, stringifyURL} = require("url");
25 !("WEBSOCKET" in browser.webRequest.ResourceType)) 25 const {checkWhitelisted} = require("whitelisting");
26 const {FilterNotifier} = require("filterNotifier");
27 const devtools = require("devtools");
28
29 const {typeMap} = RegExpFilter;
30
31 browser.webRequest.onHeadersReceived.addListener(details =>
26 { 32 {
27 const {defaultMatcher} = require("matcher"); 33 // Chrome seems to sometimes give the response type of "xmlhttprequest"
28 const {BlockingFilter, RegExpFilter} = require("filterClasses"); 34 // instead of "main_frame", but when it does the tabId is always -1 and
29 const {getDecodedHostname} = require("url"); 35 // the URL matches the initiator's URL (once normalised).
30 const {checkWhitelisted} = require("whitelisting"); 36 // https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=805649
37 if (details.type == "xmlhttprequest" &&
38 (details.tabId > -1 || details.initiator &&
39 details.url != new URL(details.initiator).toString()))
40 {
41 return;
42 }
31 43
32 browser.webRequest.onHeadersReceived.addListener(details => 44 // To avoid an extra matchesAny for the common case let's assume no
45 // $genericblock filters apply when searching for a matching $csp filter,
46 // we can double check later if necessary.
47 let specificOnly = false;
48
49 let url = new URL(details.url);
50 let hostname = getDecodedHostname(url);
51 let cspMatch = defaultMatcher.matchesAny(details.url, typeMap.CSP, hostname,
52 false, null, specificOnly);
53 let page = null;
54
55 if (cspMatch)
33 { 56 {
34 let hostname = getDecodedHostname(new URL(details.url)); 57 if (details.tabId > -1)
35 let match = defaultMatcher.matchesAny("", RegExpFilter.typeMap.WEBSOCKET,
36 hostname, false, null, true);
37 if (match instanceof BlockingFilter &&
38 !checkWhitelisted(new ext.Page({id: details.tabId}),
39 ext.getFrame(details.tabId, details.frameId)))
40 { 58 {
41 details.responseHeaders.push({ 59 page = new ext.Page({id: details.tabId, url: details.url});
42 name: "Content-Security-Policy", 60
43 // We're blocking WebSockets here by adding a connect-src restriction 61 if (cspMatch instanceof WhitelistFilter)
44 // since the Chrome extension API does not allow us to intercept them. 62 {
45 // https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=129353 63 if (devtools)
46 // 64 {
47 // We also need the frame-src and object-src restrictions since CSPs 65 devtools.logWhitelistedDocument(page, details.url, typeMap.CSP,
48 // are not inherited from the parent for documents with data: and blob: 66 hostname, cspMatch);
Sebastian Noack 2018/03/07 17:27:07 This is redundant, checkWhitelisted() is already c
Sebastian Noack 2018/03/13 03:58:13 What is about this comment?
kzar 2018/03/13 18:11:01 Done.
49 // URLs, see https://crbug.com/513860. 67 }
50 // 68 return;
51 // We must use the deprecated child-src directive instead of worker-src 69 }
52 // since that's not supported yet (as of Chrome 56.) 70
53 // 71 let frame = ext.getFrame(details.tabId, details.frameId);
54 // "http:" also includes "https:" implictly. 72
Sebastian Noack 2018/03/07 17:27:07 Nit: I think it reads slightly better without a bl
kzar 2018/03/13 18:11:02 Done.
55 // https://www.chromestatus.com/feature/6653486812889088 73 if (checkWhitelisted(page, frame, typeMap.DOCUMENT | typeMap.CSP))
56 value: "connect-src http:; child-src http:; " + 74 return;
57 "frame-src http:; object-src http:" 75
58 }); 76 // We pay the price now for skipping the specificOnly check earlier, we
59 return {responseHeaders: details.responseHeaders}; 77 // must check again for a CSP filter, this time making sure it's specific.
78 specificOnly = !!checkWhitelisted(page, frame, typeMap.GENERICBLOCK);
79 if (specificOnly)
80 {
81 cspMatch = defaultMatcher.matchesAny(details.url, typeMap.CSP, hostname,
82 false, null, specificOnly);
83 if (!(cspMatch instanceof BlockingFilter))
84 return;
85 }
86
87 FilterNotifier.emit("filter.hitCount", cspMatch, 0, 0, page);
60 } 88 }
61 }, { 89 // If we don't know the associated tab we'll have to check that if the URL
62 urls: ["http://*/*", "https://*/*"], 90 // is whitelisted manually. Things like $sitekey whitelisting and filter hit
63 // We must also intercept script requests since otherwise Web Workers can 91 // logging won't work, but it's the best we can do.
64 // be abused to execute scripts for which our Content Security Policy 92 else if (cspMatch instanceof WhitelistFilter ||
65 // won't be injected. 93 defaultMatcher.whitelist.matchesAny(stringifyURL(url),
66 // https://github.com/gorhill/uBO-Extra/issues/19 94 typeMap.DOCUMENT | typeMap.CSP,
67 types: ["main_frame", "sub_frame", "script"] 95 hostname))
68 }, ["blocking", "responseHeaders"]); 96 {
69 } 97 return;
98 }
99
100 if (devtools)
Sebastian Noack 2018/03/07 17:27:07 Is this check still necessary? IIRC, require('devt
Sebastian Noack 2018/03/13 03:58:13 What is about this comment?
kzar 2018/03/13 18:11:01 Done.
101 {
102 devtools.logRequest(page, details.url, "CSP", hostname,
103 false, null, specificOnly, cspMatch);
104 }
105
106 details.responseHeaders.push({
107 name: "Content-Security-Policy",
108 value: cspMatch.csp
109 });
110
111 return {responseHeaders: details.responseHeaders};
112 }
113 }, {
114 urls: ["http://*/*", "https://*/*"],
115 types: ["main_frame", "sub_frame", "xmlhttprequest"]
116 }, ["blocking", "responseHeaders"]);
OLDNEW
« no previous file with comments | « dependencies ('k') | lib/devtools.js » ('j') | metadata.chrome » ('J')

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld