| Left: | ||
| Right: |
| OLD | NEW |
|---|---|
| 1 /* | 1 /* |
| 2 * This file is part of Adblock Plus <https://adblockplus.org/>, | 2 * This file is part of Adblock Plus <https://adblockplus.org/>, |
| 3 * Copyright (C) 2006-present eyeo GmbH | 3 * Copyright (C) 2006-present eyeo GmbH |
| 4 * | 4 * |
| 5 * Adblock Plus is free software: you can redistribute it and/or modify | 5 * Adblock Plus is free software: you can redistribute it and/or modify |
| 6 * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 3 as | 6 * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 3 as |
| 7 * published by the Free Software Foundation. | 7 * published by the Free Software Foundation. |
| 8 * | 8 * |
| 9 * Adblock Plus is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, | 9 * Adblock Plus is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, |
| 10 * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of | 10 * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of |
| 11 * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the | 11 * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the |
| 12 * GNU General Public License for more details. | 12 * GNU General Public License for more details. |
| 13 * | 13 * |
| 14 * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License | 14 * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License |
| 15 * along with Adblock Plus. If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>. | 15 * along with Adblock Plus. If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>. |
| 16 */ | 16 */ |
| 17 | 17 |
| 18 "use strict"; | 18 "use strict"; |
| 19 | 19 |
| 20 // The webRequest API doesn't support WebSocket connection blocking in Microsoft | 20 const {defaultMatcher} = require("matcher"); |
| 21 // Edge and versions of Chrome before 58. Therefore for those we inject CSP | 21 const {BlockingFilter, RegExpFilter} = require("filterClasses"); |
| 22 // headers below as a workaround. See https://crbug.com/129353 and | 22 const {extractHostFromFrame, getDecodedHostname, |
| 23 // https://developer.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-edge/platform/issues/10297376 / | 23 isThirdParty, stringifyURL} = require("url"); |
| 24 if (!browser.webRequest.ResourceType || | 24 const {checkWhitelisted} = require("whitelisting"); |
| 25 !("WEBSOCKET" in browser.webRequest.ResourceType)) | 25 const {FilterNotifier} = require("filterNotifier"); |
| 26 const devtools = require("devtools"); | |
| 27 | |
| 28 const {typeMap} = RegExpFilter; | |
| 29 | |
| 30 browser.webRequest.onHeadersReceived.addListener(details => | |
| 26 { | 31 { |
| 27 const {defaultMatcher} = require("matcher"); | 32 let url = new URL(details.url); |
| 28 const {BlockingFilter, RegExpFilter} = require("filterClasses"); | 33 let urlString = stringifyURL(url); |
| 29 const {getDecodedHostname} = require("url"); | |
| 30 const {checkWhitelisted} = require("whitelisting"); | |
| 31 | 34 |
| 32 browser.webRequest.onHeadersReceived.addListener(details => | 35 let parentFrame = details.parentFrameId != -1 && |
| 36 ext.getFrame(details.tabId, details.parentFrameId); | |
| 37 let hostname = extractHostFromFrame(parentFrame); | |
| 38 let thirdParty = false; | |
| 39 if (hostname) | |
| 40 thirdParty = isThirdParty(url, hostname); | |
| 41 else | |
| 42 hostname = getDecodedHostname(url); | |
|
Sebastian Noack
2018/03/16 23:52:38
Is this micro-optimization worth it? Otherwise, th
kzar
2018/03/19 14:41:30
Done.
| |
| 43 | |
| 44 let cspMatch = defaultMatcher.matchesAny(urlString, typeMap.CSP, hostname, | |
| 45 thirdParty, null, false); | |
| 46 if (cspMatch) | |
| 33 { | 47 { |
| 34 let hostname = getDecodedHostname(new URL(details.url)); | 48 let page = new ext.Page({id: details.tabId, url: details.url}); |
| 35 let match = defaultMatcher.matchesAny("", RegExpFilter.typeMap.WEBSOCKET, | 49 let frame = ext.getFrame(details.tabId, details.frameId); |
| 36 hostname, false, null, true); | 50 |
| 37 if (match instanceof BlockingFilter && | 51 // To avoid an extra matchesAny for the common case we assumed no |
| 38 !checkWhitelisted(new ext.Page({id: details.tabId}), | 52 // $genericblock filters applied when searching for a matching $csp filter. |
| 39 ext.getFrame(details.tabId, details.frameId))) | 53 // We must now pay the price by first checking for a $genericblock filter |
| 54 // and if necessary that our $csp filter is specific. | |
| 55 let specificOnly = checkWhitelisted(page, frame, typeMap.GENERICBLOCK); | |
| 56 if (specificOnly) | |
| 40 { | 57 { |
| 41 details.responseHeaders.push({ | 58 cspMatch = defaultMatcher.matchesAny(urlString, typeMap.CSP, hostname, |
| 42 name: "Content-Security-Policy", | 59 thirdParty, null, specificOnly); |
| 43 // We're blocking WebSockets here by adding a connect-src restriction | 60 if (!cspMatch) |
| 44 // since the Chrome extension API does not allow us to intercept them. | 61 return; |
| 45 // https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=129353 | |
| 46 // | |
| 47 // We also need the frame-src and object-src restrictions since CSPs | |
| 48 // are not inherited from the parent for documents with data: and blob: | |
| 49 // URLs, see https://crbug.com/513860. | |
| 50 // | |
| 51 // We must use the deprecated child-src directive instead of worker-src | |
| 52 // since that's not supported yet (as of Chrome 56.) | |
| 53 // | |
| 54 // "http:" also includes "https:" implictly. | |
| 55 // https://www.chromestatus.com/feature/6653486812889088 | |
| 56 value: "connect-src http:; child-src http:; " + | |
| 57 "frame-src http:; object-src http:" | |
| 58 }); | |
| 59 return {responseHeaders: details.responseHeaders}; | |
| 60 } | 62 } |
| 61 }, { | 63 |
| 62 urls: ["http://*/*", "https://*/*"], | 64 devtools.logRequest(page, urlString, "CSP", hostname, thirdParty, null, |
| 63 // We must also intercept script requests since otherwise Web Workers can | 65 specificOnly, cspMatch); |
| 64 // be abused to execute scripts for which our Content Security Policy | 66 |
| 65 // won't be injected. | 67 if (checkWhitelisted(page, frame)) |
|
Sebastian Noack
2018/03/16 23:52:39
Why not doing this check earlier?
kzar
2018/03/19 14:41:30
Done.
| |
| 66 // https://github.com/gorhill/uBO-Extra/issues/19 | 68 return; |
| 67 types: ["main_frame", "sub_frame", "script"] | 69 |
| 68 }, ["blocking", "responseHeaders"]); | 70 FilterNotifier.emit("filter.hitCount", cspMatch, 0, 0, page); |
| 69 } | 71 |
| 72 details.responseHeaders.push({ | |
|
Sebastian Noack
2018/03/16 23:52:38
It seems this code path is reached if cspMatch is
kzar
2018/03/19 14:41:30
Done.
| |
| 73 name: "Content-Security-Policy", | |
| 74 value: cspMatch.csp | |
| 75 }); | |
| 76 | |
| 77 return {responseHeaders: details.responseHeaders}; | |
| 78 } | |
| 79 }, { | |
| 80 urls: ["http://*/*", "https://*/*"], | |
| 81 types: ["main_frame", "sub_frame"] | |
| 82 }, ["blocking", "responseHeaders"]); | |
| OLD | NEW |