Noissue - Updated requirement for $webrtc filters

pages/filters.html

Index: pages/filters.html
===================================================================
--- a/pages/filters.html
+++ b/pages/filters.html
@@ -152,7 +152,7 @@
         <li>{{s64 <code><fix>subdocument</fix></code> — embedded pages, usually included via HTML frames}}</li>
         <li>{{ping <code><fix>ping</fix></code> — requests started by <a href="https://developer.mozilla.org/docs/Web/HTML/Element/a#attr-ping"><code><fix>&lt;a ping&gt;</fix></code></a> or <a href="https://developer.mozilla.org/docs/Web/API/Navigator/sendBeacon"><code><fix>navigator.sendBeacon()</fix></code></a> (Adblock Plus 2.7.1 or higher required)}}</li>
         <li>{{websocket <code><fix>websocket</fix></code> — requests initiated via <a href="https://developer.mozilla.org/docs/Web/API/WebSocket"><code><fix>WebSocket</fix></code> object</a> (Adblock Plus 2.8 or higher required)}}</li>
-        <li>{{webrtc <code><fix>webrtc</fix></code> — connections opened via <a href="https://developer.mozilla.org/docs/Web/API/RTCPeerConnection"><code><fix>RTCPeerConnection</fix></code> instances</a> to ICE servers (Adblock Plus for Chrome and Opera 1.13.3 or higher required, Adblock Plus for Firefox and Safari not yet supported)}}</li>
+        <li>{{webrtc <code><fix>webrtc</fix></code> — connections opened via <a href="https://developer.mozilla.org/docs/Web/API/RTCPeerConnection"><code><fix>RTCPeerConnection</fix></code> instances</a> to ICE servers (Adblock Plus 1.13.3 for Chrome and Opera, 3.0 for Firefox, or higher required)}}</li>

[kzar, 2018/04/17 15:15:28]

Nit: I think the last comma could be removed "...Firefox or higher required"

[Sebastian Noack, 2018/04/17 15:18:49]

Wouldn't it read like "exactly 1.13.3 for Chrome/Opera" || "3.0 or higher for
Firefox" then (or could at least be misunderstood like that)?

[kzar, 2018/04/17 15:24:06]

Well if this was code I would have added the comma, but I feel like here it
reads better without it. But I don't feel too strongly about this either way.

[Sebastian Noack, 2018/04/17 16:44:05]

Well, code is parsed by computers, language is parsed by humans. While human
language has less strict rules, there can still be ambiguity, which in this case
is eliminated by this comma. FWIW, I asked another native English speaker, with
writing experience, who also agreed to the comma here. Anyway, since you don't
feel strong, I will push the change, now.

         <li>{{s65 <code><fix>document</fix></code> — the page itself (only <a href="#whitelist">exception rules</a> can be applied to the page)}}</li>
         <li>{{s66 <code><fix>elemhide</fix></code> — for exception rules only, similar to <code><fix>document</fix></code> but only disables <a href="#elemhide">element hiding rules</a> on the page rather than all filter rules (Adblock Plus 1.2 or higher required)}}</li>
         <li>{{generichide <code><fix>generichide</fix></code> — for exception rules only, similar to <code><fix>elemhide</fix></code> but only disables <a href="#generic-specific">generic</a> element hiding rules on the page (Adblock Plus 2.6.12 or higher required)}}</li>