Issue 7428, 7400 - Add test case for nested :-abp-properties()

test/browser/elemHideEmulation.js

Index: test/browser/elemHideEmulation.js
===================================================================
--- a/test/browser/elemHideEmulation.js
+++ b/test/browser/elemHideEmulation.js
@@ -524,16 +524,57 @@
     sibling: true,
     sibling2: true,
     toHide: true
   };
   runTestPseudoClassHasSelectorWithHasAndWithSuffixSibling(
     test, "div:-abp-has(> span:-abp-contains(Advertisment))", expectations);
 };
 
+// See issue https://issues.adblockplus.org/ticket/7359
+async function runTestCombinatorQualifier(test, selector)
+{
+  testDocument.body.innerHTML = `
+<style>
+span::before {
+  content: "any";
+}
+</style>
+<div id="toHide">
+  <a>
+    <p>
+      <span></span>
+    </p>
+  </a>
+</div>
+`;
+  if (await applyElemHideEmulation(test, [selector]))
+  {
+    expectHidden(test, testDocument.getElementById("toHide"));
+  }
+
+  test.done();
+}
+
+exports.testPropertySelectorCombinatorQualifier = function(test)
+{
+  runTestCombinatorQualifier(
+    test,
+    "div:-abp-has(> a p > :-abp-properties(content: \"any\"))"
+  );
+};
+
+exports.testPropertySelectorCombinatorQualifier2 = function(test)
+{
+  runTestCombinatorQualifier(

[Manish Jethani, 2019/04/02 06:29:10]

Can this (and possibly more tests in the future) be included in
`testPropertySelectorCombinatorQualifier()` and `test.done()` be moved out of
the `runTestCombinatorQualifier()` function?

[hub, 2019/04/02 14:29:11]

Done

+    test,
+    "div:-abp-has(> a p:-abp-has(> span:-abp-properties(content: \"any\")))"
+  );
+};
+
 async function runTestPseudoClassContains(test, selector, expectations)
 {
   testDocument.body.innerHTML = `  <style type="text/css">
     body {
       margin: 0;
       padding: 0;
     }
     .transparent {