Issue 7428, 7400 - Add test case for nested :-abp-properties()

test/browser/elemHideEmulation.js

Index: test/browser/elemHideEmulation.js
===================================================================
--- a/test/browser/elemHideEmulation.js
+++ b/test/browser/elemHideEmulation.js
@@ -524,16 +524,56 @@
     sibling: true,
     sibling2: true,
     toHide: true
   };
   runTestPseudoClassHasSelectorWithHasAndWithSuffixSibling(
     test, "div:-abp-has(> span:-abp-contains(Advertisment))", expectations);
 };
 
+// See issue https://issues.adblockplus.org/ticket/7359
+// and issue https://issues.adblockplus.org/ticket/7428
+async function runTestQualifier(test, selector)
+{
+  testDocument.body.innerHTML = `
+<style>

[Manish Jethani, 2019/04/03 17:09:30]

Nit: We could just indent the HTML here for readability, the indentation doesn't
matter in the HTML context anyway (but it makes the code more readable if we
indent it as if it were JS).

[hub, 2019/04/03 17:59:59]

Done.

+span::before {
+  content: "any";
+}
+</style>
+<div id="toHide">
+  <a>
+    <p>
+      <span></span>
+    </p>
+  </a>
+</div>
+`;
+  if (await applyElemHideEmulation(test, [selector]))
+    expectHidden(test, testDocument.getElementById("toHide"));
+
+  test.done();
+}
+
+exports.testPropertySelectorCombinatorQualifier = function(test)
+{
+  runTestQualifier(
+    test,
+    "div:-abp-has(> a p > :-abp-properties(content: \"any\"))"
+  );
+};
+
+exports.testPropertySelectorCombinatorQualifierNested = function(test)
+{
+  runTestQualifier(
+    test,
+    "div:-abp-has(> a p:-abp-has(> span:-abp-properties(content: \"any\")))"
+  );
+};
+
 async function runTestPseudoClassContains(test, selector, expectations)
 {
   testDocument.body.innerHTML = `  <style type="text/css">
     body {
       margin: 0;
       padding: 0;
     }
     .transparent {