Rietveld Code Review Tool
Help | Bug tracker | Discussion group | Source code | Sign in
(44)

Issue 5181440375390208: Issue 298 - Switched to a more current SpiderMonkey build (Closed)

Can't Edit
Can't Publish+Mail
Start Review
Created:
5 years, 10 months ago by Wladimir Palant
Modified:
5 years, 10 months ago
Reviewers:
tschuster
Visibility:
Public.

Description

Issue 298 - Switched to a more current SpiderMonkey build

Patch Set 1 #

Unified diffs Side-by-side diffs Delta from patch set Stats (+1 line, -1 line) Patch
M utils.py View 1 chunk +1 line, -1 line 0 comments Download

Messages

Total messages: 4
Wladimir Palant
5 years, 10 months ago (2014-04-15 08:07:02 UTC) #1
tschuster
On 2014/04/15 08:07:02, Wladimir Palant wrote: I believe https://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/firefox/nightly/latest-mozilla-esr24/ would be better. This one should ...
5 years, 10 months ago (2014-04-15 17:29:45 UTC) #2
Wladimir Palant
On 2014/04/15 17:29:45, tschuster wrote: > I believe > https://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/firefox/nightly/latest-mozilla-esr24/ > would be better. This ...
5 years, 10 months ago (2014-04-15 20:50:25 UTC) #3
tschuster
5 years, 10 months ago (2014-04-15 21:13:17 UTC) #4
On 2014/04/15 20:50:25, Wladimir Palant wrote:
> On 2014/04/15 17:29:45, tschuster wrote:
> > I believe
> >
https://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/firefox/nightly/latest-mozilla-esr24/
> > would be better. This one should probably stay alive until ESR31, which is
> also
> > the time when we want to update again.
> 
> As I said in the issue, we shouldn't use latest-* - we would have people use a
> random and untested SpiderMonkey build. IMHO that's too risky, even for the
ESR
> branch. We should only use builds that we tested explicitly and confirmed that
> everything is working as expected.

I kind of doubt anything is going to break in ESR, but your concern is totally
reasonable.

LGTM
Sign in to reply to this message.

Powered by Google App Engine
RSS Feeds Recent Issues | This issue
This is Rietveld 87257f5