Rietveld Code Review Tool
Help | Bug tracker | Discussion group | Source code

Issue 29328828: Issue 3129/3144 - Fixed: Findbar key handling conflicted with filter editing (Closed)

Created:
Oct. 5, 2015, 10:21 a.m. by Thomas Greiner
Modified:
Oct. 5, 2015, 6:15 p.m.
Reviewers:
Wladimir Palant
Visibility:
Public.

Description

Previous title: Issue 3129 - Ignore accessibility.typeaheadfind preference in filter settings dialog

Patch Set 1 #

Total comments: 2

Patch Set 2 : Implemented solution based on content script (also covers #3144) #

Unified diffs Side-by-side diffs Delta from patch set Stats (+27 lines, -1 line) Patch
M chrome/content/ui/filters-search.js View 1 3 chunks +27 lines, -1 line 0 comments Download

Messages

Total messages: 5
Thomas Greiner
Oct. 5, 2015, 11:30 a.m. (2015-10-05 11:30:05 UTC) #1
Wladimir Palant
https://codereview.adblockplus.org/29328828/diff/29328829/chrome/content/ui/filters-search.js File chrome/content/ui/filters-search.js (right): https://codereview.adblockplus.org/29328828/diff/29328829/chrome/content/ui/filters-search.js#newcode60 chrome/content/ui/filters-search.js:60: }); I don't think we need to disable the ...
Oct. 5, 2015, 2:17 p.m. (2015-10-05 14:17:21 UTC) #2
Thomas Greiner
https://codereview.adblockplus.org/29328828/diff/29328829/chrome/content/ui/filters-search.js File chrome/content/ui/filters-search.js (right): https://codereview.adblockplus.org/29328828/diff/29328829/chrome/content/ui/filters-search.js#newcode60 chrome/content/ui/filters-search.js:60: }); On 2015/10/05 14:17:20, Wladimir Palant wrote: > I ...
Oct. 5, 2015, 4:45 p.m. (2015-10-05 16:45:20 UTC) #3
Wladimir Palant
NOT LGTM This is getting way overboard with relying on implementation details. Please check whether ...
Oct. 5, 2015, 5:56 p.m. (2015-10-05 17:56:43 UTC) #4
Thomas Greiner
Oct. 5, 2015, 6:15 p.m. (2015-10-05 18:15:40 UTC) #5
On 2015/10/05 17:56:43, Wladimir Palant wrote:
> NOT LGTM
> 
> This is getting way overboard with relying on implementation details. Please
> check whether the simple fix I suggested will already work. If not - I guess
we
> won't have any other choice than to fork it then.

I did check that and it doesn't work, unfortunately. The second check fixes
#3144 and the third check fixes #3129. Therefore I'll close this review and look
into forking it.

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld