Rietveld Code Review Tool
Help | Bug tracker | Discussion group | Source code

Issue 29409617: Issue 5157 - Update dependency on adblockpluscore to revision 66bcf4dca35a (Closed)

Created:
April 11, 2017, 3:17 p.m. by Wladimir Palant
Modified:
April 20, 2017, 12:54 p.m.
Reviewers:
kzar
CC:
Sebastian Noack
Base URL:
https://hg.adblockplus.org/adblockplus
Visibility:
Public.

Patch Set 1 #

Patch Set 2 : Finalized patch #

Total comments: 3
Unified diffs Side-by-side diffs Delta from patch set Stats (+136 lines, -86 lines) Patch
M dependencies View 1 1 chunk +1 line, -1 line 0 comments Download
M lib/io.js View 1 chunk +135 lines, -77 lines 3 comments Download
M lib/prefs.json View 1 chunk +0 lines, -1 line 0 comments Download
M lib/utils.js View 1 chunk +0 lines, -7 lines 0 comments Download

Messages

Total messages: 5
Wladimir Palant
April 11, 2017, 3:18 p.m. (2017-04-11 15:18:01 UTC) #1
Wladimir Palant
Uploaded Patch Set 2, this is now the final version. I only had to change ...
April 20, 2017, 8:49 a.m. (2017-04-20 08:49:21 UTC) #2
kzar
Otherwise LGTM https://codereview.adblockplus.org/29409617/diff/29418567/lib/io.js File lib/io.js (right): https://codereview.adblockplus.org/29409617/diff/29418567/lib/io.js#newcode164 lib/io.js:164: if (error == "NoSuchFile") It seems like ...
April 20, 2017, 10:25 a.m. (2017-04-20 10:25:08 UTC) #3
Wladimir Palant
https://codereview.adblockplus.org/29409617/diff/29418567/lib/io.js File lib/io.js (right): https://codereview.adblockplus.org/29409617/diff/29418567/lib/io.js#newcode164 lib/io.js:164: if (error == "NoSuchFile") On 2017/04/20 10:25:07, kzar wrote: ...
April 20, 2017, 12:02 p.m. (2017-04-20 12:02:06 UTC) #4
kzar
April 20, 2017, 12:11 p.m. (2017-04-20 12:11:59 UTC) #5
https://codereview.adblockplus.org/29409617/diff/29418567/lib/io.js
File lib/io.js (right):

https://codereview.adblockplus.org/29409617/diff/29418567/lib/io.js#newcode164
lib/io.js:164: if (error == "NoSuchFile")
On 2017/04/20 12:02:06, Wladimir Palant wrote:
> On 2017/04/20 10:25:07, kzar wrote:
> > It seems like this pattern is repeated quite a bit, could you abstract it?
> 
> I thought about it but couldn't see a way requiring less complexity than there
> is right now. Do you have any suggestions?

Hmm I guess not. I didn't realise the arguments passed to callLegacy vary
slightly. Fair enough.

Powered by Google App Engine
This is Rietveld