| Index: lib/requestBlocker.js |
| =================================================================== |
| --- a/lib/requestBlocker.js |
| +++ b/lib/requestBlocker.js |
| @@ -29,9 +29,9 @@ |
| const {port} = require("messaging"); |
| const devtools = require("devtools"); |
| -// Chrome can't distinguish between OBJECT_SUBREQUEST and OBJECT requests. |
| -if (!("OBJECT_SUBREQUEST" in chrome.webRequest.ResourceType)) |
|
Sebastian Noack
2017/06/19 11:07:02
This check was necessary to account for Firefox wh
Oleksandr
2017/06/21 23:38:35
This was just accidental reverting of a patch. Fix
|
| - RegExpFilter.typeMap.OBJECT_SUBREQUEST = RegExpFilter.typeMap.OBJECT; |
| +// Chrome and Firefox (WebExtensions) can't distinguish between |
| +// OBJECT_SUBREQUEST and OBJECT requests. |
| +RegExpFilter.typeMap.OBJECT_SUBREQUEST = RegExpFilter.typeMap.OBJECT; |
| // Map of content types reported by the browser to the respecitve content types |
| // used by Adblock Plus. Other content types are simply mapped to OTHER. |
| @@ -186,7 +186,10 @@ |
| // Chrome 58 onwards directly supports WebSocket blocking, so we can ignore |
| // messages from the wrapper here (see https://crbug.com/129353). Hopefully |
| // WebRTC will be supported soon too (see https://crbug.com/707683). |
| - if (msg.requestType.toUpperCase() in chrome.webRequest.ResourceType) |
| + // Edge supports neither webRequest.ResourceType nor WebSocket blocking yet: |
| + // https://developer.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-edge/platform/issues/10297376/ |
| + if (chrome.webRequest.ResourceType && |
| + (msg.requestType.toUpperCase() in chrome.webRequest.ResourceType)) |
| return false; |
| return ext.webRequest.onBeforeRequest._dispatch( |