Index: lib/requestBlocker.js |
=================================================================== |
--- a/lib/requestBlocker.js |
+++ b/lib/requestBlocker.js |
@@ -29,9 +29,9 @@ |
const {port} = require("messaging"); |
const devtools = require("devtools"); |
-// Chrome can't distinguish between OBJECT_SUBREQUEST and OBJECT requests. |
-if (!("OBJECT_SUBREQUEST" in chrome.webRequest.ResourceType)) |
Sebastian Noack
2017/06/19 11:07:02
This check was necessary to account for Firefox wh
Oleksandr
2017/06/21 23:38:35
This was just accidental reverting of a patch. Fix
|
- RegExpFilter.typeMap.OBJECT_SUBREQUEST = RegExpFilter.typeMap.OBJECT; |
+// Chrome and Firefox (WebExtensions) can't distinguish between |
+// OBJECT_SUBREQUEST and OBJECT requests. |
+RegExpFilter.typeMap.OBJECT_SUBREQUEST = RegExpFilter.typeMap.OBJECT; |
// Map of content types reported by the browser to the respecitve content types |
// used by Adblock Plus. Other content types are simply mapped to OTHER. |
@@ -186,7 +186,10 @@ |
// Chrome 58 onwards directly supports WebSocket blocking, so we can ignore |
// messages from the wrapper here (see https://crbug.com/129353). Hopefully |
// WebRTC will be supported soon too (see https://crbug.com/707683). |
- if (msg.requestType.toUpperCase() in chrome.webRequest.ResourceType) |
+ // Edge supports neither webRequest.ResourceType nor WebSocket blocking yet: |
+ // https://developer.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-edge/platform/issues/10297376/ |
+ if (chrome.webRequest.ResourceType && |
+ (msg.requestType.toUpperCase() in chrome.webRequest.ResourceType)) |
return false; |
return ext.webRequest.onBeforeRequest._dispatch( |