Issue 6892 - Update adblockplusui dependency to hg:7386698260f4

This review contains the following changes:
- Updated adblockplusui dependency
- #5914 - Import icons used for screenshot feature in issue reporter
- #6633 - Moved translatable strings to adblockplusui
- #6749 - Updated imports for new first-run page
- #6794 - Moved popup to adblockplusui

[Sebastian Noack, 2018-09-13 12:11:27]

https://codereview.adblockplus.org/29879555/diff/29879556/metadata.chrome
File metadata.chrome (right):

https://codereview.adblockplus.org/29879555/diff/29879556/metadata.chrome#new...
metadata.chrome:71: LICENSE-3RD-PARTY.txt = adblockplusui/LICENSE-3RD-PARTY.txt
We don't include our own COPYING file into the builds either.

https://codereview.adblockplus.org/29879555/diff/29879556/metadata.chrome#new...
metadata.chrome:137: popup.html = adblockplusui/popup.html
Since those files are no longer in adblockpluschrome, please update the source
paths on https://adblockplus.org/modules. (The patch can be "Noissue".)

[Thomas Greiner, 2018-09-13 15:13:36]

https://codereview.adblockplus.org/29879555/diff/29879556/metadata.chrome
File metadata.chrome (right):

https://codereview.adblockplus.org/29879555/diff/29879556/metadata.chrome#new...
metadata.chrome:71: LICENSE-3RD-PARTY.txt = adblockplusui/LICENSE-3RD-PARTY.txt
On 2018/09/13 12:11:26, Sebastian Noack wrote:
> We don't include our own COPYING file into the builds either.

There's actually a ticket to change that (see #6765).

I guess in the end it's more of a question for Kai whether or not it should be
included in our extension bundles. We're just providing the license to the
extension here to play things safe as this seems to be a requirement for some of
those licenses.

https://codereview.adblockplus.org/29879555/diff/29879556/metadata.chrome#new...
metadata.chrome:137: popup.html = adblockplusui/popup.html
On 2018/09/13 12:11:26, Sebastian Noack wrote:
> Since those files are no longer in adblockpluschrome, please update the source
> paths on https://adblockplus.org/modules. (The patch can be "Noissue".)

Will do. Thanks for the hint.

[Sebastian Noack, 2018-09-13 15:30:30]

https://codereview.adblockplus.org/29879555/diff/29879556/metadata.chrome
File metadata.chrome (right):

https://codereview.adblockplus.org/29879555/diff/29879556/metadata.chrome#new...
metadata.chrome:71: LICENSE-3RD-PARTY.txt = adblockplusui/LICENSE-3RD-PARTY.txt
On 2018/09/13 15:13:35, Thomas Greiner wrote:
> On 2018/09/13 12:11:26, Sebastian Noack wrote:
> > We don't include our own COPYING file into the builds either.
> 
> There's actually a ticket to change that (see #6765).
> 
> I guess in the end it's more of a question for Kai whether or not it should be
> included in our extension bundles. We're just providing the license to the
> extension here to play things safe as this seems to be a requirement for some
of
> those licenses.

I commented on issue 6765. Anyway, as long as we don't even bundle out own
license with the builds, there is no point in bundling this file either.

[Thomas Greiner, 2018-09-13 16:00:32]

https://codereview.adblockplus.org/29879555/diff/29879556/metadata.chrome
File metadata.chrome (right):

https://codereview.adblockplus.org/29879555/diff/29879556/metadata.chrome#new...
metadata.chrome:71: LICENSE-3RD-PARTY.txt = adblockplusui/LICENSE-3RD-PARTY.txt
On 2018/09/13 15:30:29, Sebastian Noack wrote:
> I commented on issue 6765. Anyway, as long as we don't even bundle out own
> license with the builds, there is no point in bundling this file either.

Makes sense, I've removed the import for now.
Done.

[Thomas Greiner, 2018-09-13 16:11:00]

As requested, I've updated the dependency again to avoid the duplicate string
warning during building.

[Sebastian Noack, 2018-09-13 16:12:32]

LGTM