Issue 5493 - Add Technical_Support_Analyst job ad to eyeo.com/jobs/

Issue 5493 - Add Technical_Support_Analyst job ad to eyeo.com/jobs/

[ire, 2017-08-14 18:07:19]

https://codereview.adblockplus.org/29515599/diff/29515600/pages/jobs/technica...
File pages/jobs/technical-support-analyst.md (right):

https://codereview.adblockplus.org/29515599/diff/29515600/pages/jobs/technica...
pages/jobs/technical-support-analyst.md:5: 
In the issue there was another heading of "# Technical Support Analyst -
Remote". Is there a way for me to put the "Remote" part in the title of this
page without is showing up in the sidebar navigation?

https://codereview.adblockplus.org/29515599/diff/29515600/pages/jobs/technica...
pages/jobs/technical-support-analyst.md:25: *If this looks / sounds / feels like
you, please get in contact with your CV/resume, a short summary of why you’re
applying, your earliest possible start date and your salary expectations.*
I don't think the use of <em> here is correct/semantic, but it's what was in the
Issue. Do you think I should remove it?

[juliandoucette, 2017-08-15 12:38:51]

https://codereview.adblockplus.org/29515599/diff/29515600/pages/jobs/technica...
File pages/jobs/technical-support-analyst.md (right):

https://codereview.adblockplus.org/29515599/diff/29515600/pages/jobs/technica...
pages/jobs/technical-support-analyst.md:5: 
On 2017/08/14 18:07:19, ire wrote:
> In the issue there was another heading of "# Technical Support Analyst -
> Remote". Is there a way for me to put the "Remote" part in the title of this
> page without is showing up in the sidebar navigation?

No (Not without making a more significant change).

I suggest:
- Remind the reporter of this issue
- Suggest that "Remote" is unnecessary

Also:
- I think this is an indicator of poor content review (or no content review)

https://codereview.adblockplus.org/29515599/diff/29515600/pages/jobs/technica...
pages/jobs/technical-support-analyst.md:25: *If this looks / sounds / feels like
you, please get in contact with your CV/resume, a short summary of why you’re
applying, your earliest possible start date and your salary expectations.*
On 2017/08/14 18:07:19, ire wrote:
> I don't think the use of <em> here is correct/semantic, but it's what was in
the
> Issue. Do you think I should remove it?

See https://issues.adblockplus.org/ticket/5437

This is a stronger indicator of poor content review (or no content review).

[ire, 2017-08-15 14:01:23]

Made the changes. I've also left a comment on the issue for the change to be
reviewed by content before we go further.

https://codereview.adblockplus.org/29515599/diff/29515600/pages/jobs/technica...
File pages/jobs/technical-support-analyst.md (right):

https://codereview.adblockplus.org/29515599/diff/29515600/pages/jobs/technica...
pages/jobs/technical-support-analyst.md:5: 
On 2017/08/15 12:38:50, juliandoucette wrote:
> On 2017/08/14 18:07:19, ire wrote:
> > In the issue there was another heading of "# Technical Support Analyst -
> > Remote". Is there a way for me to put the "Remote" part in the title of this
> > page without is showing up in the sidebar navigation?
> 
> No (Not without making a more significant change).
> 
> I suggest:
> - Remind the reporter of this issue
> - Suggest that "Remote" is unnecessary
> 
> Also:
> - I think this is an indicator of poor content review (or no content review)

Acknowledged.

https://codereview.adblockplus.org/29515599/diff/29515600/pages/jobs/technica...
pages/jobs/technical-support-analyst.md:25: *If this looks / sounds / feels like
you, please get in contact with your CV/resume, a short summary of why you’re
applying, your earliest possible start date and your salary expectations.*
On 2017/08/15 12:38:50, juliandoucette wrote:
> On 2017/08/14 18:07:19, ire wrote:
> > I don't think the use of <em> here is correct/semantic, but it's what was in
> the
> > Issue. Do you think I should remove it?
> 
> See https://issues.adblockplus.org/ticket/5437
> 
> This is a stronger indicator of poor content review (or no content review).

Acknowledged.

[ire, 2017-08-15 15:23:27]

On 2017/08/15 14:01:23, ire wrote:
> Made the changes. I've also left a comment on the issue for the change to be
> reviewed by content before we go further.

Joanna is fine with the suggested changes, so if this looks good to you I can
push.

[juliandoucette, 2017-08-15 15:36:13]

LGTM